BASICS OF THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY OF THE POST-CONFLICT STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32843/juridica/2020.1.6Keywords:
peace building; economic recovery; freedom to choose the model of economic development; postconflict stateAbstract
Economic recovery of a postconflict state is of great importance for the overall process of peacebuilding through its place in people’s lives. International law does not establish clear treaty mechanisms for the process of peacebuilding (along with economic recovery), but it provides a wide range of practices of different nature, which have both a complex political composition and individual nature of the legal content. However, international law regulate this area in indirect way – through the general foundations of international law, possibly detailed in peace agreements. An article aimed to research the legal regulation of economic recovery and key component of it – the principle of freedom to choose a model of economic recovery of a postconflict state, which derives from the UN Charter of economic rights and obligations of states, and UN Declaration of Principles of International Law on Public Relations and Cooperation. The freedom to choose the model of economic recovery, which is a manifestation of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of the state, has its limit established by the rules of jus cogens, inter alia, a prohibition of discrimination. The author also focuses on social and economic rights, which in the field of economic recovery of a post-conflict state are defined through the obligation of a state to act as much as possible within available resources to ensure the gradual full execution of acknowledged social and economic human rights in all proposed ways, that may have detailed through inclusion into the peace treaty or other act of the post-conflict state. From another hand, from the point of view of international law the international community is not obliged to provide assistance to the economic recovery of a postconflict state, but in the case of such assistance has place it must comply with certain international norms, in particular regarding the implementation of economic and social human rights. The inaction of the United Nations and states towards economic recovery may be recognized as contrary to international law in the case of a threat to international peace and security or a breach of obligations undertaken by concluding an international treaty with a post-conflict state.
References
Джон Пол Ледерак. Розбудова миру. Стале примирення в розділених суспільствах. Київ, Дух і літера, 2019.
Любашенко В.І. Концепція «обов’язок захищати» і права людини. Одеса, Фенікс, 2019.
Міжнародна конвенція про ліквідацію всіх форм расової дискримінації 1965 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_105#Text.
Міжнародний пакт про економічні, соціальні і культурні права 1966 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_042#Text.
Хартия экономических прав и обязанностей государств. Резолюция ГА ООН 3281 (XXIX) от 12 декабря 1974 года. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_077#Text.
Boutros-Ghali, B. An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking, and Peace-Keeping: Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the Statement Adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992, New York: United States, 1992.
Cahil-Ripley, A. Reclaiming the Peacebuilding Agenda: Economic and Social Rights as a Legal Framework for Building Positive Peace - A Human Security Plus Approach to Peacebuilding. Human Rights Law Review, 16, 2016.
Call, C.T. and Cousens, E.M. (2008). Ending Wars and Building Peace: International Responses to Wartorn Societies. International Studies Perspectives, 9.
Collier, P. Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and Their Implications for Policy. Working Paper [online], The World Bank. 2000.
Dam-de Jong, D. Building a Sustainable Peace: How Peace Processes Shape and are Shaped by the International Legal Framework for the Governance of Natural Resources. RECIEL, 0, 2019.
Jayachandran, S. and Kremer, M. Applying the Odious Debt Doctrine while Preserving Lending. The American Economic Review, 96, 2006.
Lauterpacht, H. The Function of Law in the International Community. OUP, 2011.
Selby, J. The Myth of Liberal Peace-Building. Conflict, Security & Development, 13(1), 2013.
Stahn, C. and Kleffner, J.K. (ed.). Jus Post Bellum: Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008.
Subedi, D. B. Economic Dimension of Peacebuilding: Insights into Post-Conflict Economic Recovery and Development in Nepal. South Asia Economic Journal, 13(2), 2012.
World Bank. Post-Conflict Reconstruction: The Role of the World Bank. World Bank, Washington, DC, 1998.